Net
neutrality has many pros and cons. Many people are in support of it because it
treats all network user and web site equally. Nobody receives unfair special
treatment, this is the main concept behind net neutrality. Another reason why
people support it, is because it encourages innovation. New concepts have the
same opportunity to be successful no matter who develops them. This causes the
best possible ideas to be seen and spread. However, net neutrality also has
some cons. Some people are against it because they believe that tiered access
could improve the internet. They believe that large companies would be capable
to pay more for their internet access. This money would go towards network
improvements that would benefit the average web user. The other major argument against net neutrality
is that it adds unneeded legislation that could slow down the improvement of
the overall quality of the internet.
Recently,
the United States appeals court ruled that regulators could no longer utilize
the concept of net neutrality. Verizon argued that net neutrality negatively affected
their ability to make deals with providers, and their capability to run
improved speed access to premium material.
This
topic is related to freedom of speech because people who are against the court’s
ruling believe that this will limit the freedom of speech of individuals. They
believe that the ruling will allow commercial companies to have the authority
to block internet traffic, and direct users away from content that they do not
want them to see for any particular reason. Which, in theory could cause these
companies to not allow viewers to view content they do not support.
The
recent news on net neutrality will affect me, as well as all other internet
users. If corporations are able to steer users away from certain content, then
anyone trying to do research, could be limited to only seeing one side of the
situation. Being a student, I am still undecided with how I stand on certain
major issues of our country. The internet is currently a great tool to compile
information that can allow me to generate a stance. However, if there is only one side of the argument
available, it takes credibility away from the internet and I would use other
means for research.
I am in
support of net neutrality. It is the best system of how the internet should be
run in terms of fairness. Every user and publisher should have the same
opportunities to view/ have their content be viewed. The internet should not
turn into a bidding war. If all content is treated equally, the best will rise
to the top, and this is how the best overall internet quality will be obtained.
Below
are two links of sites that I found that discuss the recent information about
net neutrality. I decided that both of these sites were valid because they are
the websites of a major newspaper/ magazine. Due to this, they will have double
checked their information, and would not publish false facts. I also checked
this information up against what they both said, and they both presented the
same information.